Search for: All records

Abstract Greater tree diversity often increases forest productivity by increasing the fraction of light captured and the effectiveness of light use at the community scale. However, light may shape forest function not only as a source of energy or a cause of stress but also as a context cue: Plant photoreceptors can detect specific wavelengths of light, and plants use this information to assess their neighborhoods and adjust their patterns of growth and allocation. These cues have been well documented in laboratory studies, but little studied in diverse forests. Here, we examined how the spectral profile of light (350–2200 nm) transmitted through canopies differs among tree communities within three diversity experiments on two continents (200 plots each planted with one to 12 tree species, amounting to roughly 10,000 trees in total), laying the groundwork for expectations about how diversity in forests may shape light quality with consequences for forest function. We hypothesized—and found—that the species composition and diversity of tree canopies influenced transmittance in predictable ways. Canopy transmittance—in total and in spectral regions with known biological importance—principally declined with increasing leaf area per ground area (LAI) and, in turn, LAI was influenced by the species composition and diversity of communities. For a given LAI, broadleaved angiosperm canopies tended to transmit less light with lower red‐to‐far‐red ratios than canopies of needle‐leaved gymnosperms or angiosperm‐gymnosperm mixtures. Variation among communities in the transmittance of individual leaves had a minor effect on canopy transmittance in the visible portion of the spectrum but contributed beyond this range along with differences in foliage arrangement. Transmittance through mixed species canopies often deviated from expectations based on monocultures, and this was only partly explained by diversity effects on LAI, suggesting that diversity effects on transmittance also arose through shifts in the arrangement and optical properties of foliage. We posit that differences in the spectral profile of light transmitted through diverse canopies serve as a pathway by which tree diversity affects some forest ecosystem functions. 

Abstract It is commonly expected that exotic plants experience reduced herbivory, but experimental evidence for such enemy release is still controversial. One reason for conflicting results might be that community context has rarely been accounted for, although the surrounding plant diversity may moderate enemy release. Here, we tested the effects of focal tree origin and surrounding tree diversity on herbivore abundance and leaf damage in a cross‐Atlantic tree‐diversity experiment in Canada and Germany. We evaluated six European tree species paired with six North American congeners in both their native and exotic range, expecting lower herbivory for the exotic tree species in each pair at each site. Such reciprocal experiments have long been called for, but have not been realized thus far. In addition to a thorough evaluation of overall enemy release effects, we tested whether enemy release effects changed with the surrounding tree diversity. Herbivore abundance was indeed consistently lower on exotics across all six tree genera (12 comparisons). This effect of exotic status was independent of the continent, phylogenetic relatedness, and surrounding tree diversity. In contrast, leaf damage associated with generalist leaf chewers was consistently higher on North American tree species. Interestingly, several species of European weevils were the most abundant leaf chewers on both continents and the dominant herbivores at the Canadian site. Thus, most observed leaf damage is likely to reflect the effect of generalist herbivores that feed heavily on plant species with which they have not evolved. At the German site, sap suckers were the dominant herbivores and showed a pattern consistent with enemy release. Taken together, the consistently lower herbivory on exotics on both continents is not purely a pattern of enemy release in the strictest sense, but to some degree additionally reflects the susceptibility of native plants to invasive herbivores. In conclusion, our cross‐Atlantic study is consistent with the idea that nonnative trees have generally reduced herbivory, regardless of tree community diversity and species identity, but for different reasons depending on the dominant herbivore guild. 

Summary Decades of studies have demonstrated links between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, yet the generality of the relationships and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, especially for forest ecosystems.Using 11 tree‐diversity experiments, we tested tree species richness–community productivity relationships and the role of arbuscular (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungal‐associated tree species in these relationships.Tree species richness had a positive effect on community productivity across experiments, modified by the diversity of tree mycorrhizal associations. In communities with both AM and ECM trees, species richness showed positive effects on community productivity, which could have resulted from complementarity between AM and ECM trees. Moreover, both AM and ECM trees were more productive in mixed communities with both AM and ECM trees than in communities assembled by their own mycorrhizal type of trees. In communities containing only ECM trees, species richness had a significant positive effect on productivity, whereas species richness did not show any significant effects on productivity in communities containing only AM trees.Our study provides novel explanations for variations in diversity–productivity relationships by suggesting that tree–mycorrhiza interactions can shape productivity in mixed‐species forest ecosystems. 

Although decades of research suggest that higher species richness improves ecosystem functioning and stability, planted forests are predominantly monocultures. To determine whether diversification of plantations would enhance aboveground carbon storage, we systematically reviewed over 11,360 publications, and acquired data from a global network of tree diversity experiments. We compiled a maximum dataset of 79 monoculture to mixed comparisons from 21 sites with all variables needed for a meta-analysis. We assessed aboveground carbon stocks in mixed-species planted forests vs. (a) the average of monocultures, (b) the best monoculture, and (c) commercial species monocultures, and examined potential mechanisms driving differences in carbon stocks between mixtures and monocultures. On average, we found that aboveground carbon stocks in mixed planted forests were 70% higher than the average monoculture, 77% higher than commercial monocultures, and 25% higher than the best performing monocultures, although the latter was not statistically significant. Overyielding was highest in four-species mixtures (richness range 2–6 species), but otherwise none of the potential mechanisms we examined (nitrogen-fixer present vs. absent; native vs. non-native/mixed origin; tree diversity experiment vs. forestry plantation) consistently explained variation in the diversity effects. Our results, predominantly from young stands, thus suggest that diversification could be a very promising solution for increasing the carbon sequestration of planted forests and represent a call to action for more data to increase confidence in these results and elucidate methods to overcome any operational challenges and costs associated with diversification. 

Abstract Ensuring the sustainability of forest ecosystems requires understanding the mechanisms underlying tree growth and predicting their relative influence across taxa and environments.Functional ecology posits that variation in tree growth is related to individual differences in functional traits, which serve as proxies for resource acquisition and investment strategies. However, studies of trait–growth relationships have produced inconsistent results, likely due to unaccounted factors like interspecific interactions, ontogeny, differing leaf habit strategies, and variation in resource acquisition and allocation.We investigated the utility of key functional traits as predictors of tree height growth rates in common garden experiments in the absence of interspecific interactions. We posit that trait–growth relationships vary with age and between two groups relating to leaf habit: deciduous and evergreen species.Using data from 38 tree species planted in monoculture plots across seven sites of the International Diversity Experiment Network with Trees (IDENT) in North America and Europe, we compiled height growth rates over 9 years post‐germination. We modelled growth using a Bayesian hierarchical generalized linear model incorporating four above‐ground functional traits related to resource acquisition and investment: specific leaf area (SLA), wood density (WD), leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and seed mass (SM). Improvements in predictive power due to the variation of trait effects with age and leaf habit were evaluated via alternative hypothesis‐driven models, using the Expected Log Pointwise Predictive Density (ELPD) as a performance measure.Trait effects on growth varied with age and leaf habit, shifting between positive and negative effects, reflecting changes in resource acquisition and investment strategies. The relationships between traits and growth were strongest during the first three growing seasons for deciduous species and during the seventh to the ninth for evergreen species. Accounting for age and leaf habit substantially improved predictive power.Synthesis.Traits are not consistently associated with tree growth rates but instead reflect dynamic resource acquisition and investment strategies over time and between deciduous and evergreen species. Despite this variability, our findings confirm the utility of functional traits to predict tree growth rates, especially when trait effects are considered to vary with age and leaf habit.